|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas; INIA Salto Grande; INIA Tacuarembó. |
Fecha : |
21/02/2014 |
Actualizado : |
01/12/2020 |
Autor : |
Euclides Filho, K. |
Título : |
Avaliacao de touros de racas zebuinas e alguns resultados de cruzamentos entre zebu e racas europeias no Brasil central |
Fecha de publicación : |
1993 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
ln: Puignau, J.P. (ed.). Evaluación y elección de biotipos de acuerdo a los sistemas de producción. Montevideo (Uruguay): IICA-PROCISUR, 1993. |
Páginas : |
p84-102 |
Serie : |
(IICA-PROCISUR. Diálogo, 35) |
ISBN : |
92-9039-215-0 |
Idioma : |
Español |
Notas : |
Contiene : trabajos presentados en Reunión sobre biotipos de ganado bovino de carne en función de los sistemas de producción, 1988 Ago 22-26 : Balcarce y Reunión sobre evaluación de distintos biotipos con énfasis en ganado Cebú y sus cruzas en términos de productividad por hectárea y rendimiento de carne, 1991 May 20-24 : Corrientes |
Thesagro : |
BRASIL; CEBU; CRUZAMIENTO; DISTRIBUCION GEOGRAFICA; PESO CORPORAL; PRODUCTOS DEL CRUZAMIENTO; RAZAS (ANIMALES); TORO. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- A50 Investigación agraria |
Marc : |
LEADER 01175naa a2200253 a 4500 001 1006177 005 2020-12-01 008 1993 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 020 $a92-9039-215-0 100 1 $aEUCLIDES FILHO, K. 245 $aAvaliacao de touros de racas zebuinas e alguns resultados de cruzamentos entre zebu e racas europeias no Brasil central 260 $c1993 300 $ap84-102 490 $a(IICA-PROCISUR. Diálogo, 35) 500 $aContiene : trabajos presentados en Reunión sobre biotipos de ganado bovino de carne en función de los sistemas de producción, 1988 Ago 22-26 : Balcarce y Reunión sobre evaluación de distintos biotipos con énfasis en ganado Cebú y sus cruzas en términos de productividad por hectárea y rendimiento de carne, 1991 May 20-24 : Corrientes 650 $aBRASIL 650 $aCEBU 650 $aCRUZAMIENTO 650 $aDISTRIBUCION GEOGRAFICA 650 $aPESO CORPORAL 650 $aPRODUCTOS DEL CRUZAMIENTO 650 $aRAZAS (ANIMALES) 650 $aTORO 773 $tln: Puignau, J.P. (ed.). Evaluación y elección de biotipos de acuerdo a los sistemas de producción. Montevideo (Uruguay): IICA-PROCISUR, 1993.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
18/11/2015 |
Actualizado : |
09/10/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
BLUMETTO, O.; RUGGIA, A.; DALMAU, A.; ESTELLÉS, F.; VILLAGRÁ, A. |
Afiliación : |
OSCAR RICARDO BLUMETTO VELAZCO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANDREA PAOLA RUGGIA CHIESA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; A. DALMAU, IRTA (Institut de Recerca i Tecnologia Agroalimentáries); F. ESTELLÉS, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia (UPV); A. VILLAGRÁ, IVIA (Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias). |
Título : |
Behavioural characterisation of Holstein steers in three different production systems. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2015 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Animal Production Science, 2015, volume 56, Issue 10, pages 1683-1692. |
DOI : |
10.1071/AN15078 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 25 January 2014 / Accepted 30 April 2015 / Published online 26 August 2015. |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
The objective of the present study was to characterise the behaviour of Holstein steers in three different production systems. Forty-eight castrated Holstein males were randomly divided into three groups and allocated to the following three outdoor treatments: (T1) animals confined in a yard with an area of 210 m2, (T2) animals confined in a similar-sized yard but with 6 h of access to a pasture plot, (T3) animals maintained throughout the experiment on a pasture plot. Behaviour was recorded by scan sampling, 12 h a day (from 0700 hours to 1900 hours), 3 days per week, for 4 weeks evenly distributed from Week 7 to Week 16 of the experiment. So as to assess their patterns of behaviour, a negative binomial regression, correspondence analysis and logistic regressions were performed. Grazing was the predominant behaviour among Groups T2 and T3, while ?eating hay? was the most frequent behaviour among Group T1. For all treatments, lying was the second-most frequent behaviour. Despite animals in T2 having access to pasture for only half of the time with respect to those in T3, there was no difference between both treatments in the time spent grazing. Correspondence analysis of behaviour as a function of weather conditions showed that several behaviours were close to certain weather conditions, e.g. ?standing? and ?ruminating while standing? were closer to light rainy weather, while ?lying? or ?ruminating while lying? were more related to sunny weather.?Lying? tended to increase along the day in all treatments, while ?eating hay? increased along the day within Group T1, but decreased within Groups T2 and T3. It is concluded that the management conditions associated with the systems that were studied produced different behavioural patterns in the steers. Grazing behaviour is important for the animals, and the permanent or restricted possibility to perform it, determined by the production system, meant that the patterns of other behaviours changed to give priority to pasture intake. MenosABSTRACT.
The objective of the present study was to characterise the behaviour of Holstein steers in three different production systems. Forty-eight castrated Holstein males were randomly divided into three groups and allocated to the following three outdoor treatments: (T1) animals confined in a yard with an area of 210 m2, (T2) animals confined in a similar-sized yard but with 6 h of access to a pasture plot, (T3) animals maintained throughout the experiment on a pasture plot. Behaviour was recorded by scan sampling, 12 h a day (from 0700 hours to 1900 hours), 3 days per week, for 4 weeks evenly distributed from Week 7 to Week 16 of the experiment. So as to assess their patterns of behaviour, a negative binomial regression, correspondence analysis and logistic regressions were performed. Grazing was the predominant behaviour among Groups T2 and T3, while ?eating hay? was the most frequent behaviour among Group T1. For all treatments, lying was the second-most frequent behaviour. Despite animals in T2 having access to pasture for only half of the time with respect to those in T3, there was no difference between both treatments in the time spent grazing. Correspondence analysis of behaviour as a function of weather conditions showed that several behaviours were close to certain weather conditions, e.g. ?standing? and ?ruminating while standing? were closer to light rainy weather, while ?lying? or ?ruminating while lying? were more related to sunny weather.?Lying? tended to ... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
BEHAVIOUR; CATTLE; FREE-RANGE SYSTEMS; WELFARE. |
Thesagro : |
COMPORTAMIENTO ANIMAL; GANADO BOVINO. |
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
Marc : |
LEADER 02867naa a2200265 a 4500 001 1053934 005 2019-10-09 008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1071/AN15078$2DOI 100 1 $aBLUMETTO, O. 245 $aBehavioural characterisation of Holstein steers in three different production systems.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2015 500 $aArticle history: Received 25 January 2014 / Accepted 30 April 2015 / Published online 26 August 2015. 520 $aABSTRACT. The objective of the present study was to characterise the behaviour of Holstein steers in three different production systems. Forty-eight castrated Holstein males were randomly divided into three groups and allocated to the following three outdoor treatments: (T1) animals confined in a yard with an area of 210 m2, (T2) animals confined in a similar-sized yard but with 6 h of access to a pasture plot, (T3) animals maintained throughout the experiment on a pasture plot. Behaviour was recorded by scan sampling, 12 h a day (from 0700 hours to 1900 hours), 3 days per week, for 4 weeks evenly distributed from Week 7 to Week 16 of the experiment. So as to assess their patterns of behaviour, a negative binomial regression, correspondence analysis and logistic regressions were performed. Grazing was the predominant behaviour among Groups T2 and T3, while ?eating hay? was the most frequent behaviour among Group T1. For all treatments, lying was the second-most frequent behaviour. Despite animals in T2 having access to pasture for only half of the time with respect to those in T3, there was no difference between both treatments in the time spent grazing. Correspondence analysis of behaviour as a function of weather conditions showed that several behaviours were close to certain weather conditions, e.g. ?standing? and ?ruminating while standing? were closer to light rainy weather, while ?lying? or ?ruminating while lying? were more related to sunny weather.?Lying? tended to increase along the day in all treatments, while ?eating hay? increased along the day within Group T1, but decreased within Groups T2 and T3. It is concluded that the management conditions associated with the systems that were studied produced different behavioural patterns in the steers. Grazing behaviour is important for the animals, and the permanent or restricted possibility to perform it, determined by the production system, meant that the patterns of other behaviours changed to give priority to pasture intake. 650 $aCOMPORTAMIENTO ANIMAL 650 $aGANADO BOVINO 653 $aBEHAVIOUR 653 $aCATTLE 653 $aFREE-RANGE SYSTEMS 653 $aWELFARE 700 1 $aRUGGIA, A. 700 1 $aDALMAU, A. 700 1 $aESTELLÉS, F. 700 1 $aVILLAGRÁ, A. 773 $tAnimal Production Science, 2015, volume 56, Issue 10, pages 1683-1692.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|